NASA Infiltrated by Pseudo-Scientific Socialism

by Lewis Loflin

Follow @Lewis90068157

What is this climate controversy all about? While I was researching this issue even I was stunned and alarmed by what I found. The information is out there, but hard to find.

Summary: It isn't that most scientists are Democrats, they have allowed Democrat policies to dictate science outcomes. They have fused science with non-scientific social science.

Many scientists have been or are socialists and communist. Albert Einstein was a communist. Go check it out.

In researching this issue I was dumbfounded to stumble onto a NASA funded study titled "Human and Nature DYnamical" (HANDY) model.

It involved the "US National Science Foundation supported National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, in association with a team of natural and social scientists..." (Guardian 3-14-2014)

What??? Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center??? This explains a lot.

"The HANDY model was accepted for publication in the peer-reviewed Elsevier journal, Ecological Economics."

What the hell is ecological economics? It is international socialism.

This is not science. The "solution" to fend off "irreversible collapse" is forced population and birth control, strict rationing and control of consumption, and redistribution of wealth. To quote,

"Collapse can be avoided and population can reach equilibrium if the per capita rate of depletion of nature is reduced to sustainable, and if resources are distributed in a reasonably equitable fashion."

Further,

"The NASA funded HANDY model is highly credible wake up call ... that policy and structural changes are needed immediately."

This explains why NASA has been tampering with historical climate data and is so hysterical this non-science agenda be implemented. NASA, NOAA, etc. shouldn't even be involved in this. Nor should any taxpayer funded science body. It is a remapping of communism hiding behind science.

Social science most of it irrational philosophy and postmodern nonsense pushed by communists. It has infiltrated and undermined government funded science and academia.

The Dailey Caller that linked to this had an appropriate title - NASA-Funded Study: The Way to Save Western Civilization from Collapse is Communism. (3-19-2014) As they note the study conclusion is civilization collapse is due to resource depletion and social inequality.

The study cited the Roman Empire as an example. That conclusion is nonsense. Political corruption, civil war, and immorality of the Roman ruling class were the main factors. Throw in plagues, climate change, and Christianity. It was not one or two things.

They noted something like this was pushed by Obama science adviser John P. Holdren a close associate of "population bomb" crackpot Paul Ehrlich. Like to guess their politics?

Because of being entangled into socialism and earth-centered pantheism, rejection of so-called "climate science" is a rational reaction. It is not rejection of science, but healthy skepticism.

For this reason "climate science" is pseudo-science. We must return to proper earth science education severed from pantheist ecology and socialist activism.

At this point I reject any conclusions from government scientists on any climate policy issue. They will have to prove to me these conclusions and those making them are not involved in any of this.

Most scientists in this country are Democrats. That's a problem.

By Daniel Sarewitz DEC 08, 2010 in at Slate

It is no secret that the ranks of scientists and engineers in the United States include dismal numbers of Hispanics and African-Americans, but few have remarked about another significantly underrepresented group: Republicans.

No, this is not the punch line of a joke. A Pew Research Center Poll from July 2009 showed that only around 6 percent of U.S. scientists are Republicans; 55 percent are Democrats, 32 percent are independent, and the rest "don't know" their affiliation.

This immense imbalance has political consequences...

Or could it be that disagreements over climate change are essentially political - and that science is just carried along for the ride? For 20 years, evidence about global warming has been directly and explicitly linked to a set of policy responses demanding international governance regimes, large-scale social engineering, and the redistribution of wealth. These are the sort of things that most Democrats welcome, and most Republicans hate. No wonder the Republicans are suspicious of the science.

Think about it: The results of climate science, delivered by scientists who are overwhelmingly Democratic, are used over a period of decades to advance a political agenda that happens to align precisely with the ideological preferences of Democrats. Coincidence - or causation?

Democrats More Positive About Socialism Than Capitalism

AUGUST 13, 2018 Gallup

47% of Democrats view capitalism positively, down from 56% in 2016
57% of Democrats now view socialism positively, little changed from 2010
Republicans very positive about capitalism; 16% positive on socialism

What do UN climate experts say about climate change?

"Basically, it is a big mistake to discuss climate policy apart from the big issues of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun (Mexico) at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the biggest business conferences since the Second World War ... But one has to be clear: we are effectively redistributing world wealth through climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy..."

See Climate Change Dogma About Money

Bartender and New York Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says:

"Fighting climate change will be 'the civil rights movement of our generation' It's inevitable that we will create jobs. We can use the transition to 100 percent renewable energy as the vehicle to truly deliver and establish economic, social and racial justice in the United States of America."

I take them at their word.