
Climate in My Lifetime
As a kid in the 1970s, I felt cold summers and saw destructive floods in Virginia, like those from Hurricanes Camille (1969) and Agnes (1972). Scientists then warned of global cooling, with temperatures dropping nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit since the 1940s. By the 1980s, it warmed again, showing climate swings are normal.
A 1974 Time Magazine article noted “telltale signs” of cooling, like thicker Arctic ice and armadillos moving south. These shifts weren’t caused by humans but by natural cycles, like changes in ocean currents. This history shows climate can change quickly, with or without our influence.
Extreme Weather in the 1970s
The 1970s saw wild weather. The 1974 Super Outbreak spawned 148 tornadoes across 13 states, killing 330 people. In Africa, a six-year drought worsened famines. These events, tied to natural patterns, remind us that extreme weather isn’t new, even if it feels dramatic today.
El Niño and Nature’s Cycles
El Niño, a natural warming of Pacific waters, drives extreme weather. In 1925, it raised sea temperatures by 16 degrees Celsius, starving 24 million seabirds. In 2023, El Niño warmed the Atlantic, but this isn’t new—it’s been happening for centuries. We need more data to know how much is natural versus human-driven.
Saharan dust also affects climate, cooling oceans by reflecting sunlight. In 2023, low dust levels may have boosted warming, but this cycle has occurred for decades. These patterns show nature’s complexity, urging caution in blaming humans alone.
Climate Models and Policy
Computer models predict future climates, but they rely on uncertain data, like proxy records or spotty measurements. The 1930s Dust Bowl, a severe drought, shows nature can cause long dry spells without human help. Models are useful but shouldn’t drive policy without solid evidence.
Policy should focus on adaptation, like better forest management or efficient farming, not unproven predictions. Reason and evidence, not fear, should guide our choices.
Summary
Droughts, floods, and climate shifts are normal parts of Earth’s history, from the 1800s to today. Historical records and natural evidence, like tree rings, show climate has always varied. While humans may play a role, we must rely on clear data, not exaggerated claims, to understand and respond.
This series has explored nature’s resilience, past climate events, and modern shifts. I urge readers to study the evidence themselves and share these ideas. Reason, not emotion, will lead us to better solutions.
Share This Article
Evidence based Earth Science
- Four part series:
- Part 1: Nature’s Resilience
- Part 2: Historical Climate Patterns
- Part 3: Climate Evidence
- Part 4: Modern Climate and Conclusions
- Climate Change is not a Hoax - Bristol Blog
- Plant Stomata CO2 Climate Record - Bristol Blog
- Oceans Regulate Climate: Earth’s Resilience
- Answering the Eco-Luddites Fear of Technology
- Eco-Theology: Indoctrinating Kids, Breaking the Constitution
- Environmentalism as Religion: Dogma Over Data
- Lovelock, Earth vs. Venus, and Hansen’s Alarmism
- Venus Was Never Like Earth: Science Demands Proof
- Arctic Ice Defies Climate Models: A Case for Natural Cycles
- Nuclear power and radiation facts:
- Applied Science in Action: Nuclear Reactors and Radiation Realities in Southwest Virginia
- Solar, Wind are Climate Corporatism - Bristol Blog
- CANDU Reactors – A Clean Nuclear Solution
- Standardizing Nuclear Reactors and Cutting Politics
- Nuclear Graveyards Abound with Life
- What About Humans and Nuclear Radiation?
- Radiation Basics They Should Teach in High School
- Misconceptions About Radon: Data Over Fear in Public Policy
- Natural Radioactivity in Everyday Life: Separating Fact from Fear
- What Level of Knowledge Do You Need for Electronics Technology?
- Electronics and Technology for the Hobbyist and Home Scientist