CANDU Reactors – A Clean Nuclear Solution

Introduction

“Green” energy like solar panels and wind turbines sounds great, but it comes with a dirty secret: mining metals like cobalt and lithium pollutes rivers and land, especially in poor countries like Congo and Chile. I’ve seen mining’s damage growing up in Southwest Virginia—coal scars and poisoned streams—and I know “green” isn’t clean. CANDU reactors, a proven Canadian nuclear technology, offer a better way. They produce nearly no CO2, recycle nuclear waste into fuel, and avoid toxic mining. Here’s why CANDU is the real solution for energy and climate, explained for regular folks.

Clean power without the “green” mess.

What Are CANDU Reactors?

CANDU (Canada Deuterium Uranium) reactors have been powering homes safely since the 1960s, with about 50 running in Canada, India, and South Korea. They use heavy water to make energy from uranium and can swap fuel without stopping, making them efficient. Unlike most nuclear plants, CANDUs can use not just regular uranium but also waste materials, cutting pollution and CO2 (just 5–6 grams per kilowatt-hour, vs. coal’s 800–1000). They’re safe, with no major accidents, and perfect for a cleaner future.

Recycling Nuclear Waste as Fuel

CANDU reactors turn what’s called nuclear “waste” into new fuel, reducing the need for mining and its toxic fallout. Here’s how they do it:

Depleted Uranium (DU): After making fuel for other reactors, we have 1.5–2 million tons of DU worldwide—enough to power CANDUs for centuries. CANDUs mix DU with a bit of plutonium or enriched uranium, producing clean energy without new mining.
Spent Fuel Rods: Used fuel from other reactors (400,000 tons globally) contains plutonium and uranium. CANDUs use a process called DUPIC to turn this into fuel, cutting waste by 30–40% and powering cities for decades.
Thorium: Thorium, a waste from mining rare earth metals for “green” tech, is abundant (6 million tons globally). CANDUs can turn thorium into uranium-233 for fuel, producing energy with less long-term waste.

Cutting Mining Waste and Pollution

“Green” energy relies on mining cobalt, lithium, and rare earths, creating thousands of tons of toxic waste per ton of metal—think arsenic and cadmium poisoning rivers in Congo and Chile. In Southwest Virginia, I’ve seen mining wreck land and water, and it’s worse in poor countries with no rules. CANDU reactors avoid this mess:

Less Mining: CANDUs need far less uranium (10,000–20,000 tons/year globally) than the millions of tons of metals for “green” tech. Recycling DU, spent fuel, and thorium could stop new mining entirely.
Cleaner Waste: CANDU’s recycled fuel cuts nuclear waste by up to 90%, with some safe in 100–1,000 years, unlike “green” battery waste piling up in dumps.
Third-World Relief: By skipping “green” mining, CANDUs spare communities in Africa and South America from polluted water and lost land.

Nuclear capacity factor: actual output versus maximum, typically 85–95%.

The capacity factor in nuclear power measures how much electricity a plant produces compared to its maximum possible output if it ran at full power all the time. Expressed as a percentage, it shows the plant’s efficiency and reliability. For example, a 1,000 MW plant producing 8,000,000 MWh in a year out of a possible 8,760,000 MWh has a ~91% capacity factor. Nuclear plants typically achieve 85–95% due to steady operation, with downtime mainly for maintenance or refueling. This high reliability makes nuclear power a dependable energy source compared to renewables like wind or solar.

Why Aren’t We Using More CANDU?

Despite their benefits, CANDUs face hurdles:

Fear: Old accidents like Chernobyl scare people, though CANDUs have a perfect safety record.
Politics: “Green” groups push wind and solar, ignoring their mining damage, while rejecting nuclear for ideological reasons. Governments give billions to renewables but little to nuclear.
Cost: A CANDU costs ~$7–10 billion to build and takes 10–12 years, but it’s cheaper long-term than coal or gas.

The IPCC’s focus on CO2 (420 ppm) and scary warming predictions pushes “green” solutions that pollute more than they help. CANDU is a proven, cleaner path.

Share This Article

Conclusion

CANDU reactors offer a clean, practical way to produce energy with nearly no CO2 and minimal pollution. By recycling depleted uranium, spent fuel, and thorium, they avoid the toxic mining that “green” energy like solar and wind depends on—mining that hurts places like Congo and echoes the coal damage I’ve seen in Southwest Virginia. CANDUs cut nuclear waste, protect third-world communities, and provide reliable power, unlike the “green” hype pushed by fear and politics. Let’s embrace proven nuclear technology for a cleaner, sensible future.