The Ozone Region: Resilience, Recovery, and Human Impact

By Lewis Loflin | Published May 18, 2025

How Ozone Depletion Works

Stratospheric ozone (O₃) forms when UV radiation splits O₂ into oxygen atoms.

These atoms then combine with O₂ to form O₃ (Chapman, 1930).

From the 1970s to 1990s, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs or freon) released chlorine (Cl•) in the stratosphere.

This chlorine catalytically destroys ozone: Cl• + O₃ → ClO + O₂.

The Cl• is recycled, destroying thousands of O₃ molecules (Molina & Rowland, 1974).

Ozone levels are measured in Dobson Units (DU).

DU represents the total amount of ozone in a vertical column of the atmosphere from the ground to the top.

If all the ozone in that column were compressed into a pure layer at Earth’s surface under standard conditions, 1 DU would be 0.01 mm thick.

So, 300 DU—a typical amount—would form a 3 mm layer.

This is about the thickness of a few stacked pennies.

In reality, this ozone is distributed across a region in the stratosphere (10–50 km up).

The region is about ~40 km thick, with the main concentration (~10 km thick) peaking at 20–30 km altitude (Dobson, 1968; Solomon, 1999).

In the Antarctic, unique conditions amplify this process during spring (September–October).

These conditions include extreme cold (-78°C), polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs), and a strong polar vortex.

They reduce ozone by 33–70%, from 300 DU to 100–150 DU (Solomon, 1999).

Why “Ozone Hole” Is Misleading

The term “ozone hole” suggests a complete absence of ozone, but it’s not a hole—it’s a significant reduction, dropping below 220 DU over the Antarctic. Globally, CFCs caused a modest 3–5% reduction (e.g., 350 DU to 330–340 DU) by the 1990s (Staehelin et al., 2001). The Antarctic’s severe depletion is localized, driven by its unique conditions, not replicated elsewhere (e.g., Arctic depletion reached ~220 DU in 2011) (Manney et al., 2011).

Recovery and Adaptation: Earth’s Resilience

Ozone Recovery: The 1987 Montreal Protocol banned CFCs, reducing stratospheric chlorine by ~20% (from 3 ppb in the 1990s to 2.4 ppb in 2025). Global ozone has recovered to 345–350 DU, nearly pre-1980 levels, and the Antarctic “hole” has shrunk by ~20% since 2000, reaching 120 DU in 2024. Full recovery is projected by 2060–2070 (NOAA, 2025; NASA, 2024).

Ecosystem Adaptation: Southern Ocean phytoplankton, impacted by a 20% UV-B increase during the “hole,” adapted by producing UV-protective compounds (mycosporine-like amino acids, up 30%), shifting to UV-tolerant species (e.g., diatoms), and migrating deeper in the water column, recovering annually by November (Smith et al., 1992; Arrigo et al., 2003). Krill and higher trophic levels (penguins, seals) also rebound, showing ecosystem resilience (Loeb et al., 1999).

Earth’s Inherent Adjustment: Even without human intervention, the ozone region would recover as CFCs (lifetime ~45–100 years) naturally cycle out, and UV-driven ozone formation continues. Historically, Earth adjusted to UV stressors (e.g., end-Permian extinction) through natural mechanisms (Visscher et al., 2004).

Human Brains Accelerate Recovery

Human ingenuity sped up the process. Molina and Rowland’s 1974 hypothesis identified CFCs as the culprit, leading to the Montreal Protocol. Global cooperation phased out CFCs, halving their atmospheric levels by 2025 (NOAA, 2025). Monitoring (e.g., NASA’s OMI) and enforcement (e.g., addressing illegal CFC-11 emissions in 2018–2019) ensure progress (Montzka et al., 2018). Without this, recovery would take centuries, not decades.

Conclusion: Earth Adjusts, Humans Help

The ozone “hole” highlights Earth’s resilience—ecosystems adapt, and the ozone region recovers naturally over time. Human brains accelerated this by banning CFCs, proving we can support Earth’s adjustment while learning from its inherent capacity to heal.

A Deist Viewpoint

References

Arrigo, K. R., et al. (2003). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 253, 1–14.
Chapman, S. (1930). Philosophical Magazine, 10(64), 369–383.
Dobson, G. M. B. (1968). Applied Optics, 7(3), 387–405.
Farman, J. C., et al. (1985). Nature, 315, 207–210.
Loeb, V., et al. (1999). Nature, 387, 897–900.
Madronich, S., et al. (1998). Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, 46, 5–19.
Manney, G. L., et al. (2011). Nature, 478, 469–475.
Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974). Nature, 249, 810–812.
Montzka, S. A., et al. (2018). Nature, 557, 413–417.
NASA. (2024). Ozone Watch.
NOAA. (2025). Annual Ozone Assessment.
Schoeberl, M. R., & Hartmann, D. L. (1991). Science, 251, 46–52.
Smith, R. C., et al. (1992). Science, 255, 952–959.
Solomon, S. (1999). Reviews of Geophysics, 37(3), 275–316.
Staehelin, J., et al. (2001). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 1, 1–12.
Visscher, H., et al. (2004). PNAS, 101(36), 12952–12956.